Home » Posts tagged 'Michel Barnier'
Tag Archives: Michel Barnier
Categories
- 2020 Coronavirus
- Airbus
- Andrea Leadsom
- Arlene Foster
- Arlene Foster DUP
- Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
- Atlantic Alliance
- Automation
- Bangladesh
- Bank of England
- Barbados
- BBC
- Beirut
- Belarus
- Bombardier Aerospace
- Boris Johnson
- Brexit
- Britain
- British Agriculture Policy
- British and Commonwealth Development Bank
- British citizenship
- British Economic and Social Reform
- British Education system
- British Energy Policy
- British Environment Policy
- British Foreign Policy
- British General Election
- British Housing Policy
- British Immigration Policy
- British Industrial Policy
- British National Health Service
- British Royal Family
- British Space Policy
- British Trade Policy
- British Unemployment Insurance
- Canada
- CANZUK
- Captain Sir Tom Moore
- Catalonia
- China
- City of London
- CO2
- Confederation of British Industry (CBI)
- COP26
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Economy
- Customs Union
- Diesel Emissions
- Donald Trump
- Donald Tusk
- Economic Uncertainty
- Electric Vehicles (EV's)
- energy
- EU election 2019
- European Commission
- European Union
- Extremism
- Florence Italy
- foreign aid
- Foreign Remittances
- Foreign Tax Havens
- Fossil Fuel Subsidies
- France
- Free Trade
- Frexit
- G20 Hamburg
- G7 2019 Biarritz France
- Gibraltar
- Globalization
- Globalization+
- Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI)
- Guy Verhofstadt
- Hong Kong
- HS2
- India
- Interdependence
- International Trade
- Iran
- Iraq
- Iraq War
- Ireland
- Jacob Rees-Mogg
- January 31 2020
- Jean-Claude Juncker
- Jeremy Corbyn
- Key Brexit Dates
- Land Reclamation
- Land Reclamation from the Sea
- Leo Varadkar
- License to Build economy
- London Fisheries Convention
- London Terror Attack
- Mark Carney
- Mayor of London Sadiq Khan
- Merit Order ranking
- Michel Barnier
- Moqtada al-Sadr
- Myanmar
- NAFTA
- Network Rail (UK)
- NHS (National Health Service)
- Nicola Sturgeon
- Nigel Farage
- North Sea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway Option
- OECD
- Organic Food
- Philip Hammond
- post-Brexit
- Prorogation of Parliament
- Quintile Economics
- Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)
- renewable energy
- Republic of Ireland
- Rishi Sunak
- Royal Mail
- Royal Navy
- Russia
- Russian election 2018
- Scotland
- Scottish Independence
- Soft Brexit
- Somalia
- Spain
- Speaker John Bercow
- Special EU Status
- Speeches
- Stephen Barclay
- Syria
- Tax on Robots
- The 1 Percent
- The Anglosphere
- the backstop
- The Brexit Party
- The Commonwealth of Nations
- Theresa May
- Treaties of Utrecht
- UK
- UK cities
- UK economy
- UK Election 2017
- UK floods
- UK Foreign Aid
- UK General Election
- UK General Election 2019
- UK House of Lords
- UK military
- UK Parliament
- UK Supreme Court
- Ukraine
- UN Climate Change Conference UK 2021
- United Nations
- United States
- Ursula von der Layen
- Vlad Putin
- Working from Home
- WTO
- Xi Jinping
- York
Archives
- September 2022
- August 2022
- March 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
UK Taxpayers: If £40 Billion Isn’t Enough, Then It’s a WTO Brexit, Prime Minister
November 22, 2017 03:23 / 2 Comments on UK Taxpayers: If £40 Billion Isn’t Enough, Then It’s a WTO Brexit, Prime Minister
“It’s starting to get a little rich.” That seems to be the general opinion of UK taxpayers judging by the thousands of terse comments posted in the comments section of UK newspapers, on UK talk shows, and in places like YouTube where hundreds of Brexit videos (both pro and con) await your viewing pleasure.
But the general consensus seems to be that these extremely large numbers will require huge tax increases and may reflect badly on the Conservative Party’s chances in the next election.
It’s Fun, Fun, Fun, ’till Daddy takes the T-Bird away as the Beach Boys tune goes.
It’s great to make nice with the EU people and pay them billions in exit fees, but after a certain large number is reached taxpayers are likely to revolt, signalling the end of the Conservative reign for the foreseeable future.
Why Should There be a Divorce Bill at All?
This still, even at this late date, hasn’t been explained. AT ALL.
Not even Theresa May’s government seems to have received guidance from the EU Parliament or their negotiators as to why the UK should pay the outrageous sums demanded by the EU.
What’s it for? Everyone wants to know. The silence on this is deafening.
Both sets of numbers, whether proposed by the EU or the UK seem completely arbitrary to put it mildly.
Let’s Leave on Good Terms
Having said that, when you exit a marriage or a long-term business agreement it’s expected you don’t leave the other party in the lurch. Of course some kind of payment for loss of opportunity by the jilted party is de rigueur if you want warm trade relations to continue.
It’s also good business to NOT ask for wholly outrageous amounts of money (too late for that, I guess) otherwise, they risk ‘poisoning the well’ and even if trade continues, over time evermore billions of UK trade will be done with the U.S. and billions less with the EU.
What is Fair?
No change in money flowing across the English Channel for four more years (but no lump sum payment to the EU either) and Brexit can occur as scheduled on March 29, 2019 — but until then, the UK should continue to receive the exact same benefits from the EU as it will remain a paid-up member until that date. (Hey, no shorting us!)
After that date, the UK can continue to pay the EU the same £8 billion (net) for three more years — a full three years beyond Brexit day.
Calendar
- Article 50 triggered March 29, 2017, therefore,
- March 29, 2017 to March 29, 2018 (£8 billion net)
- March 29, 2018 to March 29, 2019 (£8 billion net)
- Also, March 29th 2019 will be Brexit day, and after that date the UK will no longer be an EU member
- March 29, 2019 to March 29, 2020 (£8 billion net)
- March 29, 2020 to March 29, 2021 (£8 billion net)
- March 29, 2021 to March 29, 2022 (£8 billion net) and the final payment to the EU
Take it or leave it Mr. Barnier, or the EU won’t get to sell their goods to the UK after March 29, 2019 except under WTO rules.
Many UK citizens will miss buying BMW’s, Mercedes Benz, Volkswagens, etc. for a couple of weeks (hehehe) until the EU would come to its senses. I bet EU heads would roll if it ever came to that.
OK, Seems Reasonable Enough. But What Will the UK Get in Return?
Nobody seems to know…