Categories
- 2020 Coronavirus
- Airbus
- Andrea Leadsom
- Arlene Foster
- Arlene Foster DUP
- Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
- Atlantic Alliance
- Automation
- Bangladesh
- Bank of England
- Barbados
- BBC
- Beirut
- Belarus
- Bombardier Aerospace
- Boris Johnson
- Brexit
- Britain
- British Agriculture Policy
- British and Commonwealth Development Bank
- British citizenship
- British Economic and Social Reform
- British Education system
- British Energy Policy
- British Environment Policy
- British Foreign Policy
- British General Election
- British Housing Policy
- British Immigration Policy
- British Industrial Policy
- British National Health Service
- British Royal Family
- British Space Policy
- British Trade Policy
- British Unemployment Insurance
- Canada
- CANZUK
- Captain Sir Tom Moore
- Catalonia
- China
- City of London
- CO2
- Confederation of British Industry (CBI)
- COP26
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Economy
- Customs Union
- Diesel Emissions
- Donald Trump
- Donald Tusk
- Economic Uncertainty
- Electric Vehicles (EV's)
- energy
- EU election 2019
- European Commission
- European Union
- Extremism
- Florence Italy
- foreign aid
- Foreign Remittances
- Foreign Tax Havens
- Fossil Fuel Subsidies
- France
- Free Trade
- Frexit
- G20 Hamburg
- G7 2019 Biarritz France
- Gibraltar
- Globalization
- Globalization+
- Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI)
- Guy Verhofstadt
- Hong Kong
- HS2
- India
- Interdependence
- International Trade
- Iran
- Iraq
- Iraq War
- Ireland
- Jacob Rees-Mogg
- January 31 2020
- Jean-Claude Juncker
- Jeremy Corbyn
- Key Brexit Dates
- Land Reclamation
- Land Reclamation from the Sea
- Leo Varadkar
- License to Build economy
- London Fisheries Convention
- London Terror Attack
- Mark Carney
- Mayor of London Sadiq Khan
- Merit Order ranking
- Michel Barnier
- Moqtada al-Sadr
- Myanmar
- NAFTA
- Network Rail (UK)
- NHS (National Health Service)
- Nicola Sturgeon
- Nigel Farage
- North Sea
- Northern Ireland
- Norway Option
- OECD
- Organic Food
- Philip Hammond
- post-Brexit
- Prorogation of Parliament
- Quintile Economics
- Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)
- renewable energy
- Republic of Ireland
- Rishi Sunak
- Royal Mail
- Royal Navy
- Russia
- Russian election 2018
- Scotland
- Scottish Independence
- Soft Brexit
- Somalia
- Spain
- Speaker John Bercow
- Special EU Status
- Speeches
- Stephen Barclay
- Syria
- Tax on Robots
- The 1 Percent
- The Anglosphere
- the backstop
- The Brexit Party
- The Commonwealth of Nations
- Theresa May
- Treaties of Utrecht
- UK
- UK cities
- UK economy
- UK Election 2017
- UK floods
- UK Foreign Aid
- UK General Election
- UK General Election 2019
- UK House of Lords
- UK military
- UK Parliament
- UK Supreme Court
- Ukraine
- UN Climate Change Conference UK 2021
- United Nations
- United States
- Ursula von der Layen
- Vlad Putin
- Working from Home
- WTO
- Xi Jinping
- York
Archives
- May 2023
- September 2022
- August 2022
- March 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
There Oughta Be a Law!
September 25, 2019 18:54 / Leave a comment
When a majority of Britons voted to leave the European Union on June 23, 2016, AND a majority of UK MP’s voted to leave the European Union on February 1, 2017 when they voted 498-114 to approve the European Union Bill allowing the UK to leave the EU, AND when a majority of Britons voted for political parties that supported Brexit in the June 8, 2017 General Election (that would be all UK political parties in that election) it follows that the UK Parliament is obligated to deliver Brexit for the British people.
It doesn’t mean that the UK government should allow themselves 10-years or more to deliver on the twice-expressed ‘Will of the People’. Because at the rate the UK Parliament is proceeding on Brexit that’s about how long it will take to get it done. If ever!
Which is why the UK needs a new law that requires Parliament to be responsive and legally accountable to voters, especially in cases where Britons have voted in a referendum, or where a major election promise has been made by the winning party. And that law should require Parliament to deliver within 2-years of the referendum date or General Election win, with severe legal penalties for non-compliance.
Failing to deliver Brexit within 2-years (we’re now at 3.5-years and counting!) has cost the UK economy approximately £69.5 billion so far due to the unceasing overpayments to the EU budget (the UK contributed £12.205 billion more to the EU budget than it got back in fiscal year 2019 alone) and additionally, the economic uncertainty costs caused by the overly-long House of Commons debates and overly-long UK government negotiating period with the EU during this Parliamentary session.
Perhaps being found in Contempt of Parliament with a fine of £10,000 per month, per MP, for each month beyond 2-years where the government hasn’t delivered within that 2-years what voters have ordered, might work to sharpen MP’s resolve.
Of course, there are MP’s working diligently to deliver on the 2016 referendum result who’ve been thwarted by their turncoat colleagues. Such diligent MP’s should obviously be rewarded — not punished.
However, the 2nd category of MP’s who were informed about the results of the June 2016 referendum, and who were members of a political party whose platform at the time included delivering Brexit, and whose party later voted to approve the European Union Bill to take the UK out of the EU, and whose party platform in the June 2017 General Election included a pro-Brexit policy and/or a pro-Brexit party manifesto, now seem to be trying to frustrate Brexit.
Which to my mind is almost a treasonable offence.
Unlike direct democracies like Switzerland, when Britons vote in a referendum it’s considered an advisory only for MP’s. I get that.
But shouldn’t UK MP’s be held accountable in any way whatsoever for their promises? Can they just promise any old thing without ever having to make good on their promises? Shouldn’t they be required to deliver the thing they’ve promised voters hundreds of times?
As an aside, it’s great fun to see certain MP’s who talked themselves and others into Brexit many months ago, now trying to talk themselves and others out of Brexit on the TV talkshow circuit… because they suddenly realize they might need to show some actual resolve and do some actual work to make Brexit happen.
Meanwhile, the average Briton does actual work for their pay every day.
If you bought a new car and you paid in full for the car, and the salesperson subsequently promised to deliver the car within a reasonable time… but then didn’t deliver the car; Would you seek legal redress or remedy from the salesperson/automotive dealership? Or would you just ‘let it go’?
How many of you would really ‘let it go’ and just move-on with your life?
Not many, I suspect.
Then why for the love of God would voters allow their MP’s to promise to deliver Brexit, and then ‘let it go’ with nary a comment, fine, nor Contempt of Parliament charge?
And the answer is; They won’t! ‘See you at the next election!’ say British voters.
It is unthinkable in a modern democracy that a Parliament would promise (hundreds of times) to honour the wishes of the people, and then after £69.5 billion has been squandered, that certain MP’s would then try to frustrate the government’s attempts to deliver on the promises made by UK Parliamentarians.
And to add insult to injury, that some MP’s would refuse to approve a General Election (the truest ‘People’s Vote’ of them all!) so that voters can decide for themselves which MP’s are true to the Will of The People.
I thought certain MP’s and their ‘rent-a-crowd’ followers wanted a ‘People’s Vote’!
It is quite without merit, it is dishonourable of individuals in the House of Commons, and it is a slap in the face of democracy that some MP’s who approved Brexit now won’t allow the government to deliver Brexit and also won’t allow the government to hold a General Election to determine the Will of The People on a pressing matter of national interest.
Parliament has Resumed Sitting… To What End?
For more chuntering-on about the Brexit they promised but won’t allow the government to deliver, for more banging-on about how the government isn’t doing its job but those same MP’s won’t allow an election to deliver on the ‘People’s Vote’ they’ve promoted in recent months?
Because, really, for £69.5 billion (and counting) Britons deserve better.
For shame, for shame, for shame, on this UK Parliament for not delivering on the Will of the People! And as for the so-called and overmuch ballyhooed ‘Will of Parliament’… it pales in importance when compared to the Will of the People!
Power to The People! And Parliament be Damned if it Won’t Do its Job!